← back to こと

こと details

write + こと — turns a verb or a whole clause into an abstract noun

kaku koto

こと — turns a verb or a whole clause into an abstract noun

meaning: writing

ひとはなし最後さいごまで聞くきくこと大事だいじだよ。

hito no hanashi o saigo made kiku koto ga daiji da yo.

What matters is listening to people right to the end. casual

レポートは金曜日きんようびまでに提出ていしゅつすること。

repooto wa kin'youbi made ni teishutsu suru koto.

Reports are to be submitted by Friday. formal

  • dictionary form
  • i-adjective
  • na-adjective
  • noun

Examples

the act or fact of doing, as an abstract noun — the pick for rules, definitions and anything stated rather than witnessed

ひとはなし最後さいごまでくことが大事だいじだよ。

hito no hanashi o saigo made kikukoto ga daiji da yo.

What matters is listening to people right to the end. casual

趣味しゅみふる地図ちずあつめることです。

shumi wa furui chizu o atsumeru koto desu.

My hobby is collecting old maps. neutral

当社とうしゃ目標もくひょうは、お客様きゃくさま安心あんしんしてお使つかいいただくことでございます。

tousha no mokuhyou wa, okyakusama ni anshin shite o tsukai itadaku koto de gozaimasu.

Our goal is for our customers to use it with peace of mind. formal

the written instruction — a bare こと ends a rule or a notice, with no copula or verb after it

レポートは金曜日きんようびまでに提出ていしゅつすること。

repooto wa kin'youbi made ni teishutsu suru koto.

Reports are to be submitted by Friday. formal

Formation

Notes

Nominalizing こと is written in kana; the kanji こと is for the full
noun (こと重大じゅうだいさ).

Related patterns

Similar

  • ということ hands the clause on as something said, heard or worked out, so it can be dropped in front of こと wherever the fact is reported (ないということがかった); bare こと takes the fact directly and is the shorter, plainer choice when the speaker vouches for it themselves.

  • Two nominalizers for one job, split by how the speaker knows the event — の is the spoken default and is the only option when the clause is seen, heard or interrupted in progress (える・こえる・める), while こと is the written pick and the only one the set frames ことができる/ことがある accept.

Lookalikes

  • うことがある is two patterns at once — nominalizer plus がある is "there is something I have to say", while the set frame ことがある on a dictionary verb is "there are times when I say it"; only the context separates them, and the frame reading is the one a learner misses.

  • A notice ends 提出ていしゅつすること。 with the copula suppressed and no addressee in sight; ことだ names one and hands down advice (相談そうだんすることだ) — the だ is the whole difference, and dropping it turns counsel into regulation.

Combines with

  • ことができる is this こと handed to できる, which needs a noun for its が-subject — の cannot stand in for it (×およぐのができる), which is why the frame is memorized whole.

  • ことにする/ことになる drop the nominalized action into the に slot of する/なる; の never appears in that slot, so くことにした has no 〜のにした counterpart.