← back to ものの

ものの details

write + although — the fact stands, and it changes nothing that follows

kaku mono no

although — the fact stands, and it changes nothing that follows

何度なんど練習れんしゅうしたものの、本番ほんばんでは実力じつりょくせなかった。

nando mo renshuu shita mono no, honban de wa jitsuryoku o dasenakatta.

I practised over and over, but on the day itself I couldn't show what I'm capable of. neutral

値段ねだんやすいものの、つくりがどうにもあらい。

nedan wa yasui mono no, tsukuri ga dounimo arai.

The price is low, but the build quality is simply crude. neutral

  • dictionary form
  • た-form
  • i-adjective
  • na-adjective
  • noun

Examples

although; ... but — the first clause is granted, and the outcome it points to does not arrive

何度なんど練習れんしゅうしたものの、本番ほんばんでは実力じつりょくせなかった。

nando mo renshuu shita mono no, honban de wa jitsuryoku o dasenakatta.

I practised over and over, but on the day itself I couldn't show what I'm capable of. neutral

値段ねだんやすいものの、つくりがどうにもあらい。

nedan wa yasui mono no, tsukuri ga dounimo arai.

The price is low, but the build quality is simply crude. neutral

前例ぜんれいのないこころみであるものの、実施じっしする価値かち十分じゅうぶんにあるとぞんじます。

zenrei no nai kokoromi de aru mono no, jisshi suru kachi wa juubun ni aru to zonjimasu.

Though it is an attempt without precedent, I believe it is well worth carrying out. formal

提案ていあん趣旨しゅし理解りかいできるものの、今年度こんねんど予算よさんでは対応たいおういたしかねます。

go teian no shushi wa rikai dekiru mono no, konnendo no yosan de wa taiou itashikanemasu.

We understand the thrust of your proposal, but we are unable to accommodate it within this year's budget. formal

Formation

Notes

The second clause must run counter to what the first sets up — ものの cannot
merely add a further fact the way が can.

Related patterns

Similar

  • のに charges the contrast with the speaker's dissatisfaction or surprise and is at home in speech (せっかくつくったのに); ものの is written-plain and emotionally flat, reporting only that the expected consequence failed to follow — which is why のに can end a sentence as a complaint (…のに。) and ものの never can.

  • ものの concedes the first clause and then denies the conclusion you would draw from it (やすいものの、しつわるい — the cheapness loses); 反面 denies nothing at all, listing a second property that stays as true as the first, which is why 反面 tolerates a purely descriptive second half where ものの demands a counter-expectation.

  • ものの must wedge between two clauses of one sentence and needs a predicate in front of it; にもかかわらず takes a bare noun with no copula at all (悪天候あくてんこうにもかかわらず) and opens sentences on its own, so it covers two positions ものの cannot reach.

  • ものの must sit between two clauses of one sentence and can never open one; とはいえ does both — it takes a clause in front (値段ねだんたかいとはいえ…) or stands at the head of a fresh sentence with the concession left behind in the previous one (…。とはいえ、…), which is where most of its written uses actually occur.

Lookalikes

  • Both wedge もの between two clauses, and the connective they carry is opposite — ものの concedes the first clause and denies what it would lead you to expect, while ものだから offers the first clause as the CAUSE of the second; swap them and the sentence's logic reverses, which the shared もの hides at reading speed.

  • ものの is a subordinating connective that leaves its clause hanging for a contrastive main clause to follow (やすいものの、しつはいまいちだ); ものがある is itself the main predicate and needs nothing after it.

  • ものの is subordinate — it leaves its clause hanging and the sentence's verdict lands after it; ものか completes the predication outright, and anything following is an afterthought tacked on behind the verdict (平気へいきなものか、あんなにしかられたんだから), never the clause the sentence was still waiting for.

Same meaning

but; even though

PatternAttaches to
どころか
反面
一方で
からといって
けど
くせに
ながらも
にせよ
にしても
に対して
のに
たところで
ても
と言っても
としても
とはいえ
ところが
とも