〜ことは〜が details
write + I do X, yes, but — the word itself is granted, and the objection follows
kaku kotoha kaku ga
I do X, yes, but — the word itself is granted, and the objection follows
meaning: do write, but
行くことは行くが、あまり気は進まない。
iku kotoha iku ga, amari ki wa susumanai.
I do go, but I'm not keen on it. neutral
おいしいことはおいしいけど、ちょっと高いよね。
oishii koto wa oishii kedo, chotto takai yo ne.
It's tasty all right, but it is a bit pricey, isn't it. casual
- dictionary form
- た-form
- i-adjective
- na-adjective
- colloquial
- alternant
Examples
I do X, all right, but — the speaker grants the very predicate at issue before qualifying it
行くことは行くが、あまり気は進まない。
ikukotohaikuga, amari ki wa susumanai.
I do go, but I'm not keen on it. neutral
おいしいことはおいしいけど、ちょっと高いよね。
oishii koto wa oishii kedo, chotto takai yo ne.
It's tasty all right, but it is a bit pricey, isn't it. casual
説明を聞くことは聞きましたが、正直よく分かりませんでした。
setsumei o kiku koto wa kikimashita ga, shoujiki yoku wakarimasen deshita.
I did listen to the explanation, but honestly I didn't really follow it. neutral
読んだことは読んだが、内容はもう覚えていない。
yonda koto wa yonda ga, naiyou wa mou oboete inai.
I did read it, but I no longer remember what was in it. neutral
このアプリは便利なことは便利だが、電池の減りが早い。
kono apuri wa benri na koto wa benri da ga, denchi no heri ga hayai.
This app is handy enough, but the battery drains fast. neutral
検討することはいたしましたが、今回は見送らせていただきます。
kentou suru koto wa itashimashita ga, konkai wa miokurasete itadakimasu.
We did give it consideration, but on this occasion we will pass. formal
Formation
{V}ことは{V}がattaches to dictionary form{V-ta}ことは{V-ta}がattaches to た-form{I}ことは{I}がattaches to i-adjective{NA-stem}なことは{NA-stem}だがattaches to na-adjective
Variant notes
- ことは〜けど — the spoken tail — が gives way to けど in conversation (おいしいことはおいしいけど、高い).
- ことは〜けれども — the unclipped form — が is the written default, けれども the careful spoken middle between it and けど.
Notes
keigo included (聞くことは聞きました, 検討することはいたしました).
Past alone may be echoed on both: 読んだことは読んだが。
Related patterns
Similar
けど concedes a whole clause and moves on; ことは〜が narrows the concession to a single word by repeating it, so the listener knows exactly which part is being granted and which part the objection is about to attack.
The が here IS the contrastive が, with the concession built in front of it — plain 〜が opposes two different facts (安いが、質が悪い), while ことは〜が first admits the very word the objection will qualify (安いことは安いが).
ものの is written register and concedes a fact that turned out not to matter; ことは〜が is spoken-first, repeats one word, and always sets up the speaker's own reservation about that same word.
Lookalikes
The た row walks straight into it — 行ったことは… sets up the experiential 行ったことがある, and only the repeated verb (行ったことは行った) tells the reader that a concession, not a life experience, is being reported.
Same 〜ことは opening, unrelated grammar — ことはない denies NECESSITY with one verb and stops there (謝ることはない), while ことは〜が repeats the verb and concedes it; reading only as far as ことは leaves the two indistinguishable.